Fantastic job on your report! I reviewed it early yesterday morning when we were preparing to serve our discovery responses and had no changes or questions. I was really impressed with your thorough analysis of the issues of the case, and you raised some strong arguments that I had not considered or delved deeply into yet. I really appreciate your perspective and work on this matter.
National Carrier Law Firm
For over 20 years, I have worked closely with Ty Sagalow. I consider him to be a good friend and colleague. At National Union, we worked together on many new creative deals as well as new products together and now at Ironshore I am pleased to be able to draw on his expertise in product development.
Ty is one of the most creative and smart dealmakers in the industry. He has the rare ability to listen to his clients needs, understand the views of the other stakeholders, and arrive at a resolution that supports his client’s profitability and long term goals. I am privileged to be able to work with him and call him my friend.
Ty – I wanted to thank you again for your assistance with the trial this week. It was a good team and you did a great job with your testimony. I loved working with you!
Senior Associate General Counsel
$20B publicly traded biotech company
Los Angeles (March 9, 2017) — A Michigan state judge has granted summary judgment to a policyholder against an AIG Unit holding that the AIG unit cannot recover $19 million in defense and settlement it paid on behalf of its insured, AlixPartner LLP, finding that the insured properly reported the claim to the insurer.
Defendant presents the expert report of Ty Sagalow who stated that plaintiff [insurance carrier] chose not to include any “related claims” or “related wrongful acts” provisions in the relevant policies…Since the “related claims” or “related wrongful act” language is absent from the policy, Plaintiff is unable to avoid liability…the Court grants Defendant’s [Policyholder] motion for summary disposition in its entirety…” (Decision at page 6 and 10)(March 3, 2017)
Law Firm representing Insured: Anderson,Kill
Issue: Meaning of phrase “claims made”
Expert retained by Insured: Ty R.Sagalow
I have known Ty for over 20 years both as a colleague and a good friend. We have worked side by side on many projects both at AIG and at Zurich. Ty possesses the greatest attributes of a chief underwriting officer, chief innovation officer and general counsel all rolled into one. He is a great leader who has the unique ability to take an idea and translate into reality providing new revenue streams for any company fortunate enough to hire him. He has my highest recommendation.
We wanted to reach out and let you know that we have tentatively settled the XXXX case. For the last several weeks, the parties have been working with a mediator on various settlement proposals, and following production of our expert rebuttal reports, we appear to have reached an agreement with the Trustee on settlement. While the language and terms of the settlement agreement have not yet been finalized, we wanted to update you on this development.
We could not have obtained this favorable settlement without your hard work and insight into the case.
My working relationship with Ty Sagalow spans over his employment at Zurich and now with Innovation Insurance Group. IIG’s initial engagement was to refine an insurance product under development and then secure suitable insurance partners. Ty accomplished both and the product is now ready for market introduction.
Other similar product and program opportunities are now in the pipeline with IIG acting as a product development consultant to Hub International in the design, development and refinement of proprietary insurance product offerings.
Our expectation for these next opportunities are very high based on Ty’s performance and “proven results” during his initial engagement.
I wanted to let you know I retained Ty Sagalow to act as an expert on the broker malpractice case I am handling. He did a first class report and identified an issue that I had not thought of before. His opinion on that issue could be a game changer in favor of the Firm client. Thank you for recommending him.
Ty, just received the below from the carrier:
By letter dated September 11, 2016, [Carrier] informed [Insured] that it was unable to find coverage for the Counterclaims under the E&O Policy for the reasons discussed in detail therein. [Carrier] reiterated its declination of coverage by letter dated January 13, 2017. By email dated February 8, 2017, you again challenged [Carrier] declination of coverage, attaching a letter from Innovation Insurance Group. [Carrier] has closely reviewed the additional information provided, and … will provide a defense to [Insured]
THANK-YOU, THANK-YOU, THANK-YOU!!
Johathan Marc Davidoff
Davidoff Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
We just won on summary judgement! Saved the client $20 million. You are an awesome D&O insurance expert!